Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 02:04
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What are some things that children used to wait for, but are no longer common in today's society?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why do so many autistic adults deal with self-hatred?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Nintendo will finally reveal more about Donkey Kong Bananza in new Direct - Polygon
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What is the difference between sales incentives and sales promotions?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
GLP-1 drug helped type 1 diabetes patients keep healthy glucose levels and lose weight - STAT
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Day One Highlights at Pro Tour Magic: The Gathering®—FINAL FANTASY™ - magic.gg